Understanding LGBTQ sexuality

96,352 Views | 1758 Replies | Last: 22 hrs ago by whitetrash
D. C. Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ron.reagan said:

D. C. Bear said:

ron.reagan said:

D. C. Bear said:

Jack Bauer said:

Waco1947 said:

What to do? What to do when your child or grandchild is LGBTQ?

don't cut off their body parts.

don't put them on hormones.

don't make irreversible decisions for your child.


"First do no harm" used to be a thing.
We've been brainwashing our kids since the beginning of time. Even if you are religious you have to at least realize that parents of a different religion are brainwashing their children as you both can't be correct.




Your opinion is noted, and would be an interesting discussion for another forum but is basically irrelevant to the question of whether it is a moral good to pump kids full of mind and body-altering chemicals and cut off their body parts.
Your opinion is noted but I think society as a whole as agreed that mind altering chemicals and removal of body parts is acceptable and even beneficial under certain situations.


I would argue that:
1. "Society as a whole" has not decided that it is a moral good to pump kids full of mind and body-altering chemicals and cut off their body parts.
2. Whether society as a whole has decided that it is a moral good to pump kids full of mind and body-altering chemicals and cut off their body parts is not determinative as to whether it is actually a moral good to pump kids full of mind and body-altering chemicals and cut off their body parts.
ron.reagan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
D. C. Bear said:

ron.reagan said:

D. C. Bear said:

ron.reagan said:

D. C. Bear said:

Jack Bauer said:

Waco1947 said:

What to do? What to do when your child or grandchild is LGBTQ?

don't cut off their body parts.

don't put them on hormones.

don't make irreversible decisions for your child.


"First do no harm" used to be a thing.
We've been brainwashing our kids since the beginning of time. Even if you are religious you have to at least realize that parents of a different religion are brainwashing their children as you both can't be correct.




Your opinion is noted, and would be an interesting discussion for another forum but is basically irrelevant to the question of whether it is a moral good to pump kids full of mind and body-altering chemicals and cut off their body parts.
Your opinion is noted but I think society as a whole as agreed that mind altering chemicals and removal of body parts is acceptable and even beneficial under certain situations.


I would argue that:
1. "Society as a whole" has not decided that it is a moral good to pump kids full of mind and body-altering chemicals and cut off their body parts.
2. Whether society as a whole has decided that it is a moral good to pump kids full of mind and body-altering chemicals and cut off their body parts is not determinative as to whether it is actually a moral good to pump kids full of mind and body-altering chemicals and cut off their body parts.
You'd be arguing with yourself
Doc Holliday
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ron.reagan said:

D. C. Bear said:

ron.reagan said:

D. C. Bear said:

Jack Bauer said:

Waco1947 said:

What to do? What to do when your child or grandchild is LGBTQ?

don't cut off their body parts.

don't put them on hormones.

don't make irreversible decisions for your child.


"First do no harm" used to be a thing.
We've been brainwashing our kids since the beginning of time. Even if you are religious you have to at least realize that parents of a different religion are brainwashing their children as you both can't be correct.




Your opinion is noted, and would be an interesting discussion for another forum but is basically irrelevant to the question of whether it is a moral good to pump kids full of mind and body-altering chemicals and cut off their body parts.
Your opinion is noted but I think society as a whole as agreed that mind altering chemicals and removal of body parts is acceptable and even beneficial under certain situations.
Society is stupid. The majority is statistically almost always wrong FYI.
ron.reagan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Doc Holliday said:

ron.reagan said:

D. C. Bear said:

ron.reagan said:

D. C. Bear said:

Jack Bauer said:

Waco1947 said:

What to do? What to do when your child or grandchild is LGBTQ?

don't cut off their body parts.

don't put them on hormones.

don't make irreversible decisions for your child.


"First do no harm" used to be a thing.
We've been brainwashing our kids since the beginning of time. Even if you are religious you have to at least realize that parents of a different religion are brainwashing their children as you both can't be correct.




Your opinion is noted, and would be an interesting discussion for another forum but is basically irrelevant to the question of whether it is a moral good to pump kids full of mind and body-altering chemicals and cut off their body parts.
Your opinion is noted but I think society as a whole as agreed that mind altering chemicals and removal of body parts is acceptable and even beneficial under certain situations.
Society is stupid. The majority is statistically almost always wrong FYI.
I agree. The moral qualifier in "moral good" depends on established principles and not what is actually good.
GrowlTowel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

What to do? What to do when your child or grandchild is LGBTQ?
Abort them?
D. C. Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ron.reagan said:

D. C. Bear said:

ron.reagan said:

D. C. Bear said:

ron.reagan said:

D. C. Bear said:

Jack Bauer said:

Waco1947 said:

What to do? What to do when your child or grandchild is LGBTQ?

don't cut off their body parts.

don't put them on hormones.

don't make irreversible decisions for your child.


"First do no harm" used to be a thing.
We've been brainwashing our kids since the beginning of time. Even if you are religious you have to at least realize that parents of a different religion are brainwashing their children as you both can't be correct.




Your opinion is noted, and would be an interesting discussion for another forum but is basically irrelevant to the question of whether it is a moral good to pump kids full of mind and body-altering chemicals and cut off their body parts.
Your opinion is noted but I think society as a whole as agreed that mind altering chemicals and removal of body parts is acceptable and even beneficial under certain situations.


I would argue that:
1. "Society as a whole" has not decided that it is a moral good to pump kids full of mind and body-altering chemicals and cut off their body parts.
2. Whether society as a whole has decided that it is a moral good to pump kids full of mind and body-altering chemicals and cut off their body parts is not determinative as to whether it is actually a moral good to pump kids full of mind and body-altering chemicals and cut off their body parts.
You'd be arguing with yourself


Not really. I am comfortable holding positions that are in tension with each other, but there is no inconsistency here for me to argue with myself over.
D. C. Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ron.reagan said:

Doc Holliday said:

ron.reagan said:

D. C. Bear said:

ron.reagan said:

D. C. Bear said:

Jack Bauer said:

Waco1947 said:

What to do? What to do when your child or grandchild is LGBTQ?

don't cut off their body parts.

don't put them on hormones.

don't make irreversible decisions for your child.


"First do no harm" used to be a thing.
We've been brainwashing our kids since the beginning of time. Even if you are religious you have to at least realize that parents of a different religion are brainwashing their children as you both can't be correct.




Your opinion is noted, and would be an interesting discussion for another forum but is basically irrelevant to the question of whether it is a moral good to pump kids full of mind and body-altering chemicals and cut off their body parts.
Your opinion is noted but I think society as a whole as agreed that mind altering chemicals and removal of body parts is acceptable and even beneficial under certain situations.
Society is stupid. The majority is statistically almost always wrong FYI.
I agree. The moral qualifier in "moral good" depends on established principles and not what is actually good.


No, it doesn't. Moral good exists independent of "established principles." Ideally, there is a congruence between the two, but that is not always the case.
ron.reagan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
D. C. Bear said:

ron.reagan said:

Doc Holliday said:

ron.reagan said:

D. C. Bear said:

ron.reagan said:

D. C. Bear said:

Jack Bauer said:

Waco1947 said:

What to do? What to do when your child or grandchild is LGBTQ?

don't cut off their body parts.

don't put them on hormones.

don't make irreversible decisions for your child.


"First do no harm" used to be a thing.
We've been brainwashing our kids since the beginning of time. Even if you are religious you have to at least realize that parents of a different religion are brainwashing their children as you both can't be correct.




Your opinion is noted, and would be an interesting discussion for another forum but is basically irrelevant to the question of whether it is a moral good to pump kids full of mind and body-altering chemicals and cut off their body parts.




4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ron.reagan said:

4th and Inches said:

ron.reagan said:

4th and Inches said:

ron.reagan said:

Waco1947 said:

Realitybites said:

There are no "LGBTQ kids".
Explain
I'm guessing he was home schooled
stop labeling things..

Children are prior to puberty which makes them asexual.

A child's absorbent mind finds all its nutriment in its surroundings. "The child, as we have seen, passes through successive phases of development and in each of these his surroundings have an important though different part to play. In none have they more importance than immediately after birth." (The Absorbent Mind, p. 88)

The push of the changes in cultural norms develops and sticks with the young. Why do you think there is such a fight over cultural ideology in elementary schools..

You can learn alot if you have a spouse with a doctorate in education.
"Children are prior to puberty which makes them asexual. "

Have you ever been a child? I'm not sure puberty had any effect on my feelings for Teri Hatcher on Superman.

"You can learn alot if you have a spouse with a doctorate in education. "

lmao


complete nonsense post

Your focus was my missed space between a and lot. Whoopty

Your comment about Teri Hatcher feelings prior to puberty is completely dumb, you were either sexually attracted to her or Dean Cain but that was during or after the purberty process. You were an adolescent, no longer a child.
Ok, I'm not a biologist. I didn't realize 8 year olds weren't children.

Could you ask you wife if a "kid" can have puberty? Since that is the word we used before you changed it to children.
by definition a kid is either a child or a small goat. As child is the singular of children, it didnt change anything to change the word except to give you another nonsense argument.

A kid is not an adolescent by definition although people use the term loosely. A kid cannot have puberty.

Adolescent by definition is a person in puberty.

“Mix a little foolishness with your serious plans. It is lovely to be silly at the right moment.”

–Horace


“Insomnia sharpens your math skills because you spend all night calculating how much sleep you’ll get if you’re able to ‘fall asleep right now.’ “
Whiskey Pete
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ron.reagan said:

Rawhide said:

ron.reagan said:

D. C. Bear said:

Jack Bauer said:

Waco1947 said:

What to do? What to do when your child or grandchild is LGBTQ?

don't cut off their body parts.

don't put them on hormones.

don't make irreversible decisions for your child.


"First do no harm" used to be a thing.
We've been brainwashing our kids since the beginning of time. Even if you are religious you have to at least realize that parents of a different religion are brainwashing their children as you both can't be correct.


Didn't you just ask

"Honest question. What level of guidance would make you want to look at balls instead of boobs?"

Now you say we've been brainwashing our kids since the beginning of time.

So, if we've been brainwashing our kids since the beginning of time, the level of guidance that it would take to make someone want to look at balls instead of boobs, may not be much - at all.

You might want to do a bit of self reflection as the straight people here know there isn't anything that can be done to cure boob infatuation
So, now you're saying that kids can't be brainwashed? Dude, make your mind
Whiskey Pete
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

ron.reagan said:

Rawhide said:

ron.reagan said:

whiterock said:

Waco1947 said:

ScottS said:

2 things....

1)Waco1947 is not real, but a bit poster. Just posting things to piss people off.
2)All of this is the enemy/devil telling people they can choose something different than God has created. God creates you male or female. Then the devil tells people.....Did God say you were a man? You don't have to accept that. You can choose. I.e. this is the devil's way of trying to destroy something God has created.

The enemy does this with lots of things. Let's take marriage. God puts a man and woman together. Then enemy then goes and tries to bust up what God created. To extend this further, God created Adam and Eve and put them together. He did not create Adam and Steve. So the enemy then comes along and tells people they don't have to do what God has created, but instead they can choose. "Love who you love". You've heard this from people like Michelle Obama, etc.


Scott, you know nothing about me. A biblical story written 6000 years ago hardly pose any significance for a modern understanding of human sexuality. I've worked with countless gays and lesbians in a few parents of transgendered young people. A morality code grounded in some Victorian repressive society and a historically, distant past from modern understandings of human sexuality hardly hold sway over the 21st century and in addition is a terrible way to judges kids. I have work for 10,000 kids over my 50 years of ministry and I stumble step my way through these issues in the 70s and 80s but making fun of these kids. Because I studied and research the issue I came to radically different understanding of human sexuality. in addition to the 10,000 kids I worked with 20,000 parents who needed the same understanding of what was happening to the young people. They love their kids and wish them no harm.
LOL No wonder the "problem" is growing. Look at how misguided the counselors are.
Honest question. What level of guidance would make you want to look at balls instead of boobs?
The same level of guidance that liberals lose their chit over when a parent doesn't "affirm" their kids gender dysphoria?
To be clear, you are one summer camp away from giving blow jobs?
No ron, sorry but you'll have to find your own 'special friends' for that.

He's gay, he just hasn't come out of the closet yet. When he does, I'm sure his two dads will be proud.
Whiskey Pete
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ron.reagan said:

Oldbear83 said:

ron.reagan said:

Rawhide said:

ron.reagan said:

whiterock said:

Waco1947 said:

ScottS said:

2 things....

1)Waco1947 is not real, but a bit poster. Just posting things to piss people off.
2)All of this is the enemy/devil telling people they can choose something different than God has created. God creates you male or female. Then the devil tells people.....Did God say you were a man? You don't have to accept that. You can choose. I.e. this is the devil's way of trying to destroy something God has created.

The enemy does this with lots of things. Let's take marriage. God puts a man and woman together. Then enemy then goes and tries to bust up what God created. To extend this further, God created Adam and Eve and put them together. He did not create Adam and Steve. So the enemy then comes along and tells people they don't have to do what God has created, but instead they can choose. "Love who you love". You've heard this from people like Michelle Obama, etc.


Scott, you know nothing about me. A biblical story written 6000 years ago hardly pose any significance for a modern understanding of human sexuality. I've worked with countless gays and lesbians in a few parents of transgendered young people. A morality code grounded in some Victorian repressive society and a historically, distant past from modern understandings of human sexuality hardly hold sway over the 21st century and in addition is a terrible way to judges kids. I have work for 10,000 kids over my 50 years of ministry and I stumble step my way through these issues in the 70s and 80s but making fun of these kids. Because I studied and research the issue I came to radically different understanding of human sexuality. in addition to the 10,000 kids I worked with 20,000 parents who needed the same understanding of what was happening to the young people. They love their kids and wish them no harm.
LOL No wonder the "problem" is growing. Look at how misguided the counselors are.
Honest question. What level of guidance would make you want to look at balls instead of boobs?
The same level of guidance that liberals lose their chit over when a parent doesn't "affirm" their kids gender dysphoria?
To be clear, you are one summer camp away from giving blow jobs?
No ron, sorry but you'll have to find your own 'special friends' for that.

Yeah, straight people call them women
So, you call them trans?
Waco1947
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whitetrash said:

ron.reagan said:

D. C. Bear said:

Jack Bauer said:

Waco1947 said:

What to do? What to do when your child or grandchild is LGBTQ?

don't cut off their body parts.

don't put them on hormones.

don't make irreversible decisions for your child.


"First do no harm" used to be a thing.
We've been brainwashing our kids since the beginning of time. Even if you are religious you have to at least realize that parents of a different religion are brainwashing their children as you both can't be correct.


But we haven't been forcing them to play dress up while we lop off their body parts.
False narrative
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Whiskey Pete
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:


Sounds like they may need to shut down gay bars since they're not essential business
nein51
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Doc Holliday said:

Waco1947 said:

What to do? What to do when your child or grandchild is LGBTQ?
this keeps up for 300+ years we are going to live in a society where identifying as LGBT is the majority based on current statistical trends.

Good news is that won't happen. Turns out you need men and women to procreate. That, in and of itself, is a current problem. If you reach a point where 50% of the population is gay there won't be a population to speak of because, in spite of what the media wants to tell you, men can't get pregnant and two women are incapable of producing sperm. A society with 50% LG (forget the other nonsense) won't make it 300 years. You would fall so far below replacement the entire society would die out…fast.
ron.reagan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
4th and Inches said:

ron.reagan said:

4th and Inches said:

ron.reagan said:

4th and Inches said:

ron.reagan said:

Waco1947 said:

Realitybites said:

There are no "LGBTQ kids".
Explain
I'm guessing he was home schooled
stop labeling things..

Children are prior to puberty which makes them asexual.

A child's absorbent mind finds all its nutriment in its surroundings. "The child, as we have seen, passes through successive phases of development and in each of these his surroundings have an important though different part to play. In none have they more importance than immediately after birth." (The Absorbent Mind, p. 88)

The push of the changes in cultural norms develops and sticks with the young. Why do you think there is such a fight over cultural ideology in elementary schools..

You can learn alot if you have a spouse with a doctorate in education.
"Children are prior to puberty which makes them asexual. "

Have you ever been a child? I'm not sure puberty had any effect on my feelings for Teri Hatcher on Superman.

"You can learn alot if you have a spouse with a doctorate in education. "

lmao


complete nonsense post

Your focus was my missed space between a and lot. Whoopty

Your comment about Teri Hatcher feelings prior to puberty is completely dumb, you were either sexually attracted to her or Dean Cain but that was during or after the purberty process. You were an adolescent, no longer a child.
Ok, I'm not a biologist. I didn't realize 8 year olds weren't children.

Could you ask you wife if a "kid" can have puberty? Since that is the word we used before you changed it to children.
by definition a kid is either a child or a small goat. As child is the singular of children, it didnt change anything to change the word except to give you another nonsense argument.

A kid is not an adolescent by definition although people use the term loosely. A kid cannot have puberty.

Adolescent by definition is a person in puberty.


You know we have the internet and access to dictionaries right?
ron.reagan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nein51 said:

Doc Holliday said:

Waco1947 said:

What to do? What to do when your child or grandchild is LGBTQ?
this keeps up for 300+ years we are going to live in a society where identifying as LGBT is the majority based on current statistical trends.

Good news is that won't happen. Turns out you need men and women to procreate. That, in and of itself, is a current problem. If you reach a point where 50% of the population is gay there won't be a population to speak of because, in spite of what the media wants to tell you, men can't get pregnant and two women are incapable of producing sperm. A society with 50% LG (forget the other nonsense) won't make it 300 years. You would fall so far below replacement the entire society would die out…fast.
My man here has sex once every 9 months
4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ron.reagan said:

4th and Inches said:

ron.reagan said:

4th and Inches said:

ron.reagan said:

4th and Inches said:

ron.reagan said:

Waco1947 said:

Realitybites said:

There are no "LGBTQ kids".
Explain
I'm guessing he was home schooled
stop labeling things..

Children are prior to puberty which makes them asexual.

A child's absorbent mind finds all its nutriment in its surroundings. "The child, as we have seen, passes through successive phases of development and in each of these his surroundings have an important though different part to play. In none have they more importance than immediately after birth." (The Absorbent Mind, p. 88)

The push of the changes in cultural norms develops and sticks with the young. Why do you think there is such a fight over cultural ideology in elementary schools..

You can learn alot if you have a spouse with a doctorate in education.
"Children are prior to puberty which makes them asexual. "

Have you ever been a child? I'm not sure puberty had any effect on my feelings for Teri Hatcher on Superman.

"You can learn alot if you have a spouse with a doctorate in education. "

lmao


complete nonsense post

Your focus was my missed space between a and lot. Whoopty

Your comment about Teri Hatcher feelings prior to puberty is completely dumb, you were either sexually attracted to her or Dean Cain but that was during or after the purberty process. You were an adolescent, no longer a child.
Ok, I'm not a biologist. I didn't realize 8 year olds weren't children.

Could you ask you wife if a "kid" can have puberty? Since that is the word we used before you changed it to children.
by definition a kid is either a child or a small goat. As child is the singular of children, it didnt change anything to change the word except to give you another nonsense argument.

A kid is not an adolescent by definition although people use the term loosely. A kid cannot have puberty.

Adolescent by definition is a person in puberty.


You know we have the internet and access to dictionaries right?
more nonsense.. dictionaries prove my post and the internet is full of misinformation like your posts.

I am out. You have nothing meaningful to add to this conversation.
“Mix a little foolishness with your serious plans. It is lovely to be silly at the right moment.”

–Horace


“Insomnia sharpens your math skills because you spend all night calculating how much sleep you’ll get if you’re able to ‘fall asleep right now.’ “
nein51
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ron.reagan said:

nein51 said:

Doc Holliday said:

Waco1947 said:

What to do? What to do when your child or grandchild is LGBTQ?
this keeps up for 300+ years we are going to live in a society where identifying as LGBT is the majority based on current statistical trends.

Good news is that won't happen. Turns out you need men and women to procreate. That, in and of itself, is a current problem. If you reach a point where 50% of the population is gay there won't be a population to speak of because, in spite of what the media wants to tell you, men can't get pregnant and two women are incapable of producing sperm. A society with 50% LG (forget the other nonsense) won't make it 300 years. You would fall so far below replacement the entire society would die out…fast.
My man here has sex once every 9 months

I, for one, appreciate the hell out of your shtick. I admire adherence to a bit.
ron.reagan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
4th and Inches said:

ron.reagan said:

4th and Inches said:

ron.reagan said:

4th and Inches said:

ron.reagan said:

4th and Inches said:

ron.reagan said:

Waco1947 said:

Realitybites said:

There are no "LGBTQ kids".
Explain
I'm guessing he was home schooled
stop labeling things..

Children are prior to puberty which makes them asexual.

A child's absorbent mind finds all its nutriment in its surroundings. "The child, as we have seen, passes through successive phases of development and in each of these his surroundings have an important though different part to play. In none have they more importance than immediately after birth." (The Absorbent Mind, p. 88)

The push of the changes in cultural norms develops and sticks with the young. Why do you think there is such a fight over cultural ideology in elementary schools..

You can learn alot if you have a spouse with a doctorate in education.
"Children are prior to puberty which makes them asexual. "

Have you ever been a child? I'm not sure puberty had any effect on my feelings for Teri Hatcher on Superman.

"You can learn alot if you have a spouse with a doctorate in education. "

lmao


complete nonsense post

Your focus was my missed space between a and lot. Whoopty

Your comment about Teri Hatcher feelings prior to puberty is completely dumb, you were either sexually attracted to her or Dean Cain but that was during or after the purberty process. You were an adolescent, no longer a child.
Ok, I'm not a biologist. I didn't realize 8 year olds weren't children.

Could you ask you wife if a "kid" can have puberty? Since that is the word we used before you changed it to children.
by definition a kid is either a child or a small goat. As child is the singular of children, it didnt change anything to change the word except to give you another nonsense argument.

A kid is not an adolescent by definition although people use the term loosely. A kid cannot have puberty.

Adolescent by definition is a person in puberty.


You know we have the internet and access to dictionaries right?
more nonsense.. dictionaries prove my post and the internet is full of misinformation like your posts.

I am out. You have nothing meaningful to add to this conversation.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/kid
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/child
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/especially

A kid is a young person, especially a child. A Child is a young person especially between infancy and puberty. Especially means in particular, or not always.

If you want to be pedantic at least be correct. Almost no one uses these words with thinking or knowing about puberty you weirdo.






ron.reagan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nein51 said:

ron.reagan said:

nein51 said:

Doc Holliday said:

Waco1947 said:

What to do? What to do when your child or grandchild is LGBTQ?
this keeps up for 300+ years we are going to live in a society where identifying as LGBT is the majority based on current statistical trends.

Good news is that won't happen. Turns out you need men and women to procreate. That, in and of itself, is a current problem. If you reach a point where 50% of the population is gay there won't be a population to speak of because, in spite of what the media wants to tell you, men can't get pregnant and two women are incapable of producing sperm. A society with 50% LG (forget the other nonsense) won't make it 300 years. You would fall so far below replacement the entire society would die out…fast.
My man here has sex once every 9 months

I, for one, appreciate the hell out of your shtick. I admire adherence to a bit.
Is it a bit to point out a bi guy could have a thousand kids in his life? If you want to worry about population then look at women's rights and access to birth control. Countries without either of those are doing "well" in that regard
nein51
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ron.reagan said:

nein51 said:

ron.reagan said:

nein51 said:

Doc Holliday said:

Waco1947 said:

What to do? What to do when your child or grandchild is LGBTQ?
this keeps up for 300+ years we are going to live in a society where identifying as LGBT is the majority based on current statistical trends.

Good news is that won't happen. Turns out you need men and women to procreate. That, in and of itself, is a current problem. If you reach a point where 50% of the population is gay there won't be a population to speak of because, in spite of what the media wants to tell you, men can't get pregnant and two women are incapable of producing sperm. A society with 50% LG (forget the other nonsense) won't make it 300 years. You would fall so far below replacement the entire society would die out…fast.
My man here has sex once every 9 months

I, for one, appreciate the hell out of your shtick. I admire adherence to a bit.
Is it a bit to point out a bi guy could have a thousand kids in his life? If you want to worry about population then look at women's rights and access to birth control. Countries without either of those are doing "well" in that regard

He could. But the data shows they don't. If you reach a point where 50% of your population is same sex there simply won't be a population.

Population is a massive problem and you can choose to ignore it but it's going to get worse not better.
ron.reagan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nein51 said:

ron.reagan said:

nein51 said:

ron.reagan said:

nein51 said:

Doc Holliday said:

Waco1947 said:

What to do? What to do when your child or grandchild is LGBTQ?
this keeps up for 300+ years we are going to live in a society where identifying as LGBT is the majority based on current statistical trends.

Good news is that won't happen. Turns out you need men and women to procreate. That, in and of itself, is a current problem. If you reach a point where 50% of the population is gay there won't be a population to speak of because, in spite of what the media wants to tell you, men can't get pregnant and two women are incapable of producing sperm. A society with 50% LG (forget the other nonsense) won't make it 300 years. You would fall so far below replacement the entire society would die out…fast.
My man here has sex once every 9 months

I, for one, appreciate the hell out of your shtick. I admire adherence to a bit.
Is it a bit to point out a bi guy could have a thousand kids in his life? If you want to worry about population then look at women's rights and access to birth control. Countries without either of those are doing "well" in that regard

He could. But the data shows they don't. If you reach a point where 50% of your population is same sex there simply won't be a population.

Population is a massive problem and you can choose to ignore it but it's going to get worse not better.
Population is a massive problem but in the exact opposite way you think it is. Regardless, 95% of the population is always going to be banging the opposite sex based on the fact that I previously brought up. There is no cure for men wanting to see boobs
4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ron.reagan said:

4th and Inches said:

ron.reagan said:

4th and Inches said:

ron.reagan said:

4th and Inches said:

ron.reagan said:

4th and Inches said:

ron.reagan said:

Waco1947 said:

Realitybites said:

There are no "LGBTQ kids".
Explain
I'm guessing he was home schooled
stop labeling things..

Children are prior to puberty which makes them asexual.

A child's absorbent mind finds all its nutriment in its surroundings. "The child, as we have seen, passes through successive phases of development and in each of these his surroundings have an important though different part to play. In none have they more importance than immediately after birth." (The Absorbent Mind, p. 88)

The push of the changes in cultural norms develops and sticks with the young. Why do you think there is such a fight over cultural ideology in elementary schools..

You can learn alot if you have a spouse with a doctorate in education.
"Children are prior to puberty which makes them asexual. "

Have you ever been a child? I'm not sure puberty had any effect on my feelings for Teri Hatcher on Superman.

"You can learn alot if you have a spouse with a doctorate in education. "

lmao


complete nonsense post

Your focus was my missed space between a and lot. Whoopty

Your comment about Teri Hatcher feelings prior to puberty is completely dumb, you were either sexually attracted to her or Dean Cain but that was during or after the purberty process. You were an adolescent, no longer a child.
Ok, I'm not a biologist. I didn't realize 8 year olds weren't children.

Could you ask you wife if a "kid" can have puberty? Since that is the word we used before you changed it to children.
by definition a kid is either a child or a small goat. As child is the singular of children, it didnt change anything to change the word except to give you another nonsense argument.

A kid is not an adolescent by definition although people use the term loosely. A kid cannot have puberty.

Adolescent by definition is a person in puberty.


You know we have the internet and access to dictionaries right?
more nonsense.. dictionaries prove my post and the internet is full of misinformation like your posts.

I am out. You have nothing meaningful to add to this conversation.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/kid
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/child
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/especially

A kid is a young person, especially a child. A Child is a young person especially between infancy and puberty. Especially means in particular, or not always.

If you want to be pedantic at least be correct. Almost no one uses these words with thinking or knowing about puberty you weirdo.


thank you, you argued my point exactly. I never said always you implied that on your own. Reread my posts. This is the reason there's no point in further discussion with you. Have a nice day.
“Mix a little foolishness with your serious plans. It is lovely to be silly at the right moment.”

–Horace


“Insomnia sharpens your math skills because you spend all night calculating how much sleep you’ll get if you’re able to ‘fall asleep right now.’ “
nein51
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ron.reagan said:

nein51 said:

ron.reagan said:

nein51 said:

ron.reagan said:

nein51 said:

Doc Holliday said:

Waco1947 said:

What to do? What to do when your child or grandchild is LGBTQ?
this keeps up for 300+ years we are going to live in a society where identifying as LGBT is the majority based on current statistical trends.

Good news is that won't happen. Turns out you need men and women to procreate. That, in and of itself, is a current problem. If you reach a point where 50% of the population is gay there won't be a population to speak of because, in spite of what the media wants to tell you, men can't get pregnant and two women are incapable of producing sperm. A society with 50% LG (forget the other nonsense) won't make it 300 years. You would fall so far below replacement the entire society would die out…fast.
My man here has sex once every 9 months

I, for one, appreciate the hell out of your shtick. I admire adherence to a bit.
Is it a bit to point out a bi guy could have a thousand kids in his life? If you want to worry about population then look at women's rights and access to birth control. Countries without either of those are doing "well" in that regard

He could. But the data shows they don't. If you reach a point where 50% of your population is same sex there simply won't be a population.

Population is a massive problem and you can choose to ignore it but it's going to get worse not better.
Population is a massive problem but in the exact opposite way you think it is. Regardless, 95% of the population is always going to be banging the opposite sex based on the fact that I previously brought up. There is no cure for men wanting to see boobs


Western countries are already below replacement rates.

And I see no reason to find a cure for looking at boobs. Personally, I love em.
Waco1947
How long do you want to ignore this user?
50 % of the population is gay? That's a ludicrous idea. I is not scientific at all
ShooterTX
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

50 % of the population is gay? That's a ludicrous idea. I is not scientific at all
learn to read.

He said, "If you reach a point where 50% of your population is same sex there simply won't be a population."

Do you see that word "if"?

Your last line is totally correct.... "I is not scientific at all"... grammatically incorrect, but you truly are not scientific at all.

ShooterTX
ron.reagan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
4th and Inches said:

ron.reagan said:

4th and Inches said:

ron.reagan said:

4th and Inches said:

ron.reagan said:

4th and Inches said:

ron.reagan said:

4th and Inches said:

ron.reagan said:

Waco1947 said:

Realitybites said:

There are no "LGBTQ kids".
Explain
I'm guessing he was home schooled
stop labeling things..

Children are prior to puberty which makes them asexual.

A child's absorbent mind finds all its nutriment in its surroundings. "The child, as we have seen, passes through successive phases of development and in each of these his surroundings have an important though different part to play. In none have they more importance than immediately after birth." (The Absorbent Mind, p. 88)

The push of the changes in cultural norms develops and sticks with the young. Why do you think there is such a fight over cultural ideology in elementary schools..

You can learn alot if you have a spouse with a doctorate in education.
"Children are prior to puberty which makes them asexual. "

Have you ever been a child? I'm not sure puberty had any effect on my feelings for Teri Hatcher on Superman.

"You can learn alot if you have a spouse with a doctorate in education. "

lmao


complete nonsense post

Your focus was my missed space between a and lot. Whoopty

Your comment about Teri Hatcher feelings prior to puberty is completely dumb, you were either sexually attracted to her or Dean Cain but that was during or after the purberty process. You were an adolescent, no longer a child.
Ok, I'm not a biologist. I didn't realize 8 year olds weren't children.

Could you ask you wife if a "kid" can have puberty? Since that is the word we used before you changed it to children.
by definition a kid is either a child or a small goat. As child is the singular of children, it didnt change anything to change the word except to give you another nonsense argument.

A kid is not an adolescent by definition although people use the term loosely. A kid cannot have puberty.

Adolescent by definition is a person in puberty.


You know we have the internet and access to dictionaries right?
more nonsense.. dictionaries prove my post and the internet is full of misinformation like your posts.

I am out. You have nothing meaningful to add to this conversation.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/kid
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/child
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/especially

A kid is a young person, especially a child. A Child is a young person especially between infancy and puberty. Especially means in particular, or not always.

If you want to be pedantic at least be correct. Almost no one uses these words with thinking or knowing about puberty you weirdo.


thank you, you argued my point exactly. I never said always you implied that on your own. Reread my posts. This is the reason there's no point in further discussion with you. Have a nice day.
"Children are prior to puberty which makes them asexual. "

That was your response to the claim that children can't be LGBTQ#D33-

If children can sometimes be post puberty than that isn't the case. Please ask your wife to explain this to you and get back to me.




ron.reagan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nein51 said:

ron.reagan said:

nein51 said:

ron.reagan said:

nein51 said:

ron.reagan said:

nein51 said:

Doc Holliday said:

Waco1947 said:

What to do? What to do when your child or grandchild is LGBTQ?
this keeps up for 300+ years we are going to live in a society where identifying as LGBT is the majority based on current statistical trends.

Good news is that won't happen. Turns out you need men and women to procreate. That, in and of itself, is a current problem. If you reach a point where 50% of the population is gay there won't be a population to speak of because, in spite of what the media wants to tell you, men can't get pregnant and two women are incapable of producing sperm. A society with 50% LG (forget the other nonsense) won't make it 300 years. You would fall so far below replacement the entire society would die out…fast.
My man here has sex once every 9 months

I, for one, appreciate the hell out of your shtick. I admire adherence to a bit.
Is it a bit to point out a bi guy could have a thousand kids in his life? If you want to worry about population then look at women's rights and access to birth control. Countries without either of those are doing "well" in that regard

He could. But the data shows they don't. If you reach a point where 50% of your population is same sex there simply won't be a population.

Population is a massive problem and you can choose to ignore it but it's going to get worse not better.
Population is a massive problem but in the exact opposite way you think it is. Regardless, 95% of the population is always going to be banging the opposite sex based on the fact that I previously brought up. There is no cure for men wanting to see boobs


Western countries are already below replacement rates.

And I see no reason to find a cure for looking at boobs. Personally, I love em.
I'm watching a live feed right now of people coming in by the thousands to replace us. Most of them don't like birth control either.
ron.reagan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ShooterTX said:

Waco1947 said:

50 % of the population is gay? That's a ludicrous idea. I is not scientific at all
learn to read.

He said, "If you reach a point where 50% of your population is same sex there simply won't be a population."

Do you see that word "if"?

Your last line is totally correct.... "I is not scientific at all"... grammatically incorrect, but you truly are not scientific at all.


If there were 1 dude and 2 women on the planet the male population would be 33% or < 50%.

The dude knocks up both women 10 times each over their life time. Not only is this great erotic fiction but also a path for exponential growth over several generations.
Forest Bueller_bf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ron.reagan said:

nein51 said:

ron.reagan said:

nein51 said:

ron.reagan said:

nein51 said:

ron.reagan said:

nein51 said:

Doc Holliday said:

Waco1947 said:

What to do? What to do when your child or grandchild is LGBTQ?
this keeps up for 300+ years we are going to live in a society where identifying as LGBT is the majority based on current statistical trends.

Good news is that won't happen. Turns out you need men and women to procreate. That, in and of itself, is a current problem. If you reach a point where 50% of the population is gay there won't be a population to speak of because, in spite of what the media wants to tell you, men can't get pregnant and two women are incapable of producing sperm. A society with 50% LG (forget the other nonsense) won't make it 300 years. You would fall so far below replacement the entire society would die out…fast.
My man here has sex once every 9 months

I, for one, appreciate the hell out of your shtick. I admire adherence to a bit.
Is it a bit to point out a bi guy could have a thousand kids in his life? If you want to worry about population then look at women's rights and access to birth control. Countries without either of those are doing "well" in that regard

He could. But the data shows they don't. If you reach a point where 50% of your population is same sex there simply won't be a population.

Population is a massive problem and you can choose to ignore it but it's going to get worse not better.
Population is a massive problem but in the exact opposite way you think it is. Regardless, 95% of the population is always going to be banging the opposite sex based on the fact that I previously brought up. There is no cure for men wanting to see boobs


Western countries are already below replacement rates.

And I see no reason to find a cure for looking at boobs. Personally, I love em.
I'm watching a live feed right now of people coming in by the thousands to replace us. Most of them don't like birth control either.

Yea, even though the US is at 1.9 fertility rate, there are plenty of people to make up for that, we don't have to worry about a declining population.

Poland on the other hand at 1.3 replacement, they will decline shortly. As will much of Western Europe and Eastern Europe.

Puerto Rico even is at 1.5 children per woman. Way below replacement.

It is a real issue in some parts of the world.
ron.reagan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Forest Bueller_bf said:

ron.reagan said:

nein51 said:

ron.reagan said:

nein51 said:

ron.reagan said:

nein51 said:

ron.reagan said:

nein51 said:

Doc Holliday said:

Waco1947 said:

What to do? What to do when your child or grandchild is LGBTQ?
this keeps up for 300+ years we are going to live in a society where identifying as LGBT is the majority based on current statistical trends.

Good news is that won't happen. Turns out you need men and women to procreate. That, in and of itself, is a current problem. If you reach a point where 50% of the population is gay there won't be a population to speak of because, in spite of what the media wants to tell you, men can't get pregnant and two women are incapable of producing sperm. A society with 50% LG (forget the other nonsense) won't make it 300 years. You would fall so far below replacement the entire society would die out…fast.
My man here has sex once every 9 months

I, for one, appreciate the hell out of your shtick. I admire adherence to a bit.
Is it a bit to point out a bi guy could have a thousand kids in his life? If you want to worry about population then look at women's rights and access to birth control. Countries without either of those are doing "well" in that regard

He could. But the data shows they don't. If you reach a point where 50% of your population is same sex there simply won't be a population.

Population is a massive problem and you can choose to ignore it but it's going to get worse not better.
Population is a massive problem but in the exact opposite way you think it is. Regardless, 95% of the population is always going to be banging the opposite sex based on the fact that I previously brought up. There is no cure for men wanting to see boobs


Western countries are already below replacement rates.

And I see no reason to find a cure for looking at boobs. Personally, I love em.
I'm watching a live feed right now of people coming in by the thousands to replace us. Most of them don't like birth control either.

Yea, even though the US is at 1.9 fertility rate, there are plenty of people to make up for that, we don't have to worry about a declining population.

Poland on the other hand at 1.3 replacement, they will decline shortly. As will much of Western Europe and Eastern Europe.

Puerto Rico even is at 1.5 children per woman. Way below replacement.

It is a real issue in some parts of the world.
Poland, the country that actually built a big beautiful wall to keep people out?
4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ron.reagan said:

4th and Inches said:

ron.reagan said:

4th and Inches said:

ron.reagan said:

4th and Inches said:

ron.reagan said:

4th and Inches said:

ron.reagan said:

4th and Inches said:

ron.reagan said:

Waco1947 said:

Realitybites said:

There are no "LGBTQ kids".
Explain
I'm guessing he was home schooled
stop labeling things..

Children are prior to puberty which makes them asexual.

A child's absorbent mind finds all its nutriment in its surroundings. "The child, as we have seen, passes through successive phases of development and in each of these his surroundings have an important though different part to play. In none have they more importance than immediately after birth." (The Absorbent Mind, p. 88)

The push of the changes in cultural norms develops and sticks with the young. Why do you think there is such a fight over cultural ideology in elementary schools..

You can learn alot if you have a spouse with a doctorate in education.
"Children are prior to puberty which makes them asexual. "

Have you ever been a child? I'm not sure puberty had any effect on my feelings for Teri Hatcher on Superman.

"You can learn alot if you have a spouse with a doctorate in education. "

lmao


complete nonsense post

Your focus was my missed space between a and lot. Whoopty

Your comment about Teri Hatcher feelings prior to puberty is completely dumb, you were either sexually attracted to her or Dean Cain but that was during or after the purberty process. You were an adolescent, no longer a child.
Ok, I'm not a biologist. I didn't realize 8 year olds weren't children.

Could you ask you wife if a "kid" can have puberty? Since that is the word we used before you changed it to children.
by definition a kid is either a child or a small goat. As child is the singular of children, it didnt change anything to change the word except to give you another nonsense argument.

A kid is not an adolescent by definition although people use the term loosely. A kid cannot have puberty.

Adolescent by definition is a person in puberty.


You know we have the internet and access to dictionaries right?
more nonsense.. dictionaries prove my post and the internet is full of misinformation like your posts.

I am out. You have nothing meaningful to add to this conversation.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/kid
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/child
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/especially

A kid is a young person, especially a child. A Child is a young person especially between infancy and puberty. Especially means in particular, or not always.

If you want to be pedantic at least be correct. Almost no one uses these words with thinking or knowing about puberty you weirdo.


thank you, you argued my point exactly. I never said always you implied that on your own. Reread my posts. This is the reason there's no point in further discussion with you. Have a nice day.
"Children are prior to puberty which makes them asexual. "

That was your response to the claim that children can't be LGBTQ#D33-

If children can sometimes be post puberty than that isn't the case. Please ask your wife to explain this to you and get back to me.


sigh..

Same dictionary you think you know how to use.. link provided on especially has a hyperlink to particular:

3: in particular : SPECIFICALLY

Especially means particular which means specifically

Replace especially with specifically in your prior post and you might get you missed the mark.

You seem like a person who likes to use can when you really mean may and think it means the same thing.

I will give you points for pedantic.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/specially

2b

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/particularly

3
“Mix a little foolishness with your serious plans. It is lovely to be silly at the right moment.”

–Horace


“Insomnia sharpens your math skills because you spend all night calculating how much sleep you’ll get if you’re able to ‘fall asleep right now.’ “
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.